Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacIver, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorPollack, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T20:18:49Z
dc.date.available2019-09-11T20:18:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMacIver, A.; Pollack, D. (2016). Ministerial versus discretionary acts or omissions in child welfare ligitgation. Capital University Law Review, 44(1), 103-126.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0198-9693
dc.identifier.urihttps://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/capulr44&i=113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4666
dc.descriptionPeer-reviewed scholarly articleen_US
dc.description.abstractToo often the child welfare system fails our children, especially foster children, leaving our most vulnerable population at risk of harm. Many children in the welfare system are injured or even killed because “[t]he system frequently fails to provide children with stable, secure care” and “fails to meet foster children’s basic medical, psychological, and emotional needs.” This system-wide failure is the result of several recurring problems, which are on the rise, including: inadequate investigation of prospective foster parents and their families, placing children in inappropriate homes, overcrowded foster homes, placing children with first-time foster parents who are inexperienced and become overwhelmed, and inadequate supervision of foster homes. These recurring problems have resulted in harm to those children under the care of the child welfare system, leading many of them to seek redress in the courts.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCapital University Law Schoolen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCapital University Law Review;44(1)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectministerial actsen_US
dc.subjectdiscretionary actsen_US
dc.subjectchild welfare litigationen_US
dc.subjectofficial immunityen_US
dc.subjecttort liabilityen_US
dc.subjectWalker v. Gilberten_US
dc.subjectWilliams v. Hortonen_US
dc.subjectMississippi Department of Human Services v. S.W.en_US
dc.subjectJames ex rel. James v. Frienden_US
dc.subjectGeorgia Department of Human Services. v. Spruillen_US
dc.subjectCounty of Los Angeles v. Superior Courten_US
dc.subjectOrtega v. Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Servicesen_US
dc.subjectAE v. County of Tulareen_US
dc.subjectScott v. County of Los Angelesen_US
dc.subjectBrodie v. Summit County Children Services Boarden_US
dc.subjectPolitical Subdivision Tort Liability Act (Act)en_US
dc.subject§2744.02(A)(1)en_US
dc.subjectcivil liabilityen_US
dc.titleMinisterial versus discretionary acts or omissions in child welfare litigation.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States