Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/6324| Title: | No peeking allowed. |
| Authors: | Pollack, Daniel Reiter, Elisa 0000-0001-7323-6928 |
| Keywords: | recusal remote participation Zoom court hearings impartial justice Covid-19 jurors judges National Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice (NCCCJ) virtual courts witnesses Jurisprudential peeking technological innovation judicial excellence |
| Issue Date: | 3-Nov-2020 |
| Publisher: | Austin, Tex. : Butterworth Legal Publishers |
| Citation: | Pollack, daniel and Reiter, Elisa. No peeking allowed. (November 3, 2020). Texas Lawyer. https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2020/11/03/no-peeking-allowed/ |
| Series/Report no.: | Texas Lawyer;November 3, 2020 |
| Abstract: | Judges have a responsibility to recuse themselves from any cases in which they cannot act impartially. Today, ironically, in the very name of justice, there are people who want Justitia’s blindfold not to be tightened, but to be loosened. |
| Description: | Commentary / Article |
| URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/6324 https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2020/11/03/no-peeking-allowed/ |
| ISSN: | 0267-8306 |
| Appears in Collections: | Wurzweiler School of Social Work: Faculty publications |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollack Reiser art Texas Lawyer No peeking allowed 11-4-20.pdf | 210.52 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
