Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEBNER, DAVID YECHIEL
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T18:07:00Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T18:07:00Z
dc.date.issued1980
dc.identifier.citationSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 41-04, Section: A, page: 1577.
dc.identifier.urihttps://yulib002.mc.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:8021233
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/2640
dc.description.abstractStatement of Thesis. Mishnah represents an amalgamation of literary sources joined together in a logical fashion by its editor. A grasp of its literary structure will aid in the clarification of the text and, concomittantly, serve to enrich our understanding of the editorial process itself.;The traditional theory of Mishnah structure and composition views the Mishnah as a seamless whole in which the editor sought to provide new information in each pericope. The fruits of modern research suggest, however, that the editor sought to remain faithful to his sources even at the expense of some clarity of meaning and logic of sequence.;This work analyzes a body of Mishnaic material dealing with the ordeal to which a suspected adulteress could be subjected which is contained in Tractate Sotah, Chapters I-VI. It attempts to identify those literary phenomena in Mishnah which point to the nature of the editorial process. Any study of Mishnah necessarily involves an analysis of parallel Tannaitic literature and its relationship to Mishnaic material. Particularly important is the identification of the nature of the relationship of Tosefta to Mishnah.;Procedures Followed. The history of Mishnaic text can be fathomed only by a study focusing both on the present context of material in Mishnah and its relationship with proximate material in Mishnah and its relationship with proximate material as well as its context and formulation in other sources. Thus, a study of all parallel literature in the Talmudim, Midrashe Halaka and Tosefta was conducted in which the question of literary structure was paramount. In addition, a careful study of topical material not included in Mishnah was conducted in order to better gauge the principles by which the editor selected material for inclusion in Mishnah.;This method made use of the problems raised by the traditional commentaries. However, most of their solutions of Mishnah's problems are based on a harmonistic conceptions of Mishnah composition. Nonetheless, the problems often prove to be the keys to particular facts of Mishnah's literary history.;Conclusions. The pericopae analyzed bear out the thesis that the Mishnah editor attempted to construct a logically ordered presentation while at the same time preserving the literary structure of his sources. This axiom serves to elucidate the basic sense of much difficult material and reinforces the hypothesis that the Mishnah was never intended as a strictly legal code. Tosefta order differs from that of Mishnah but this should not be considered proof that Tosefta relates to a different Mishnah composition.
dc.publisherProQuest Dissertations & Theses
dc.subjectClassical literature.
dc.titleTHE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE OF MISHNAH "SOTAH"
dc.typeDissertation


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record