• Login as Editor
    View Item 
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies (BRGS)
    • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies (BRGS)
    • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Radak's contribution to the tradition of figurative biblical exegesis

    Thumbnail
    Date
    1994
    Author
    Cohen, Mordechai Z.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Scholarship of medieval Jewish exegesis often views figurative exegesis as a reflection of philosophical and polemical considerations. This study, however, evaluates the linguistic and literary perceptions reflected in Radak's figurative exegesis. Radak clearly borrowed terminology and linguistic concepts from Ibn Ezra and Maimonides, his predecessors in the rationalist exegetical tradition. Yet he adapted these components to create an innovative system of figurative exegesis that yields a sharper analysis than provided by his predecessors.;The first part of this study outlines the three key terms Radak employs in connection with figurative language. He (1) applies the term mashal to all types of figurative language (metaphor, allegory, simile); but (2) limits hash'alah to a small number of single-term metaphors. He (3) uses melizah to signify the literal sense of a mashal.;The second part identifies Radak's contribution to the exegetical tradition by comparing him with Ibn Ezra and Maimonides, both of whom interpret biblical metaphors by providing a simple literal paraphrase. In so doing, they ignore the literary beauty of the metaphorical imagery. Radak borrows the terminology of his predecessors but more fully captures that literary beauty.;Following Maimonides, Radak uses hash'alah, in contrast to mashal, for dead metaphor, i.e. a standardized metaphorical usage that no longer activates its original sense (e.g. the leg of a triangle). Apparently for philosophical reasons, Maimonides classifies most biblical metaphors as hash'alah. Radak, however, reverses the Maimonidean hash'alah-mashal ratio and makes mashal his primary category. By isolating dead metaphor in the marginal hash'alah category, Radak limits mashal to active, poetic metaphors, for which he devises a special exegetical mode.;Radak introduces the notion of melizah in his mashal exegesis to analyze metaphor as a dynamic interaction of the image with the real-world referent. By employing distinctive formulas of comparison, e.g. "kemo x ken y," he incorporates the imagery conveyed by the melizah into his mashal readings. In so doing, he indicates that the formulation of biblical figurative language is essential to its meaning, a conception that motivates him to provide richer, more incisive figurative readings.
    Permanent Link(s)
    https://yulib002.mc.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9509708
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/3583
    Collections
    • Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies: Doctoral Dissertations [191]

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University
     

     

    Browse

    AllCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login as Editor

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University