• Login as Editor
    View Item 
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Psychological predictors of attrition in geriatric weight loss

    Thumbnail

    Date
    1998
    Author
    Steinmuller, Lillian
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    Abstract
    The present study aimed to clarify psychological factors that would discriminate between the completers and dropouts of a voluntary weight loss program. The Dietary Intervention: Evaluation of Technology (DIET) study was a community based study of older adults that, using behaviorally oriented interventions, aimed to achieve weight loss and weight maintenance, to reduce cardiovascular risk, and to reduced practitioner time. A sample of 302 subjects was dichotomized into dropouts' and "completers".;The measures used were the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Psychological Well-Being Index (PGWB). There were no significant differences between dropouts and compliers in terms of age, sex, or any of the BSI questions, scales, or summary scores. There were a number of significant differences between the groups on individual PGWB questions, but not on the PGWB itself (the sum of the questions) or any of the subscales. Multivariate analyses were done to evaluate the combined action of the 22 PGWB questions as predictors.;Discriminant function analysis produced a model with 12 variables. This was highly significant (p = .002), and correctly classified 65% of the group as a whole, 77% of the completers, and 52% of the dropouts. Principal Components Analysis yielded a simple, interpretable three factor model. The factor scores effectively discriminated the two groups when submitted as predictors to a discriminant function analysis. One factor, which accounted for most of the total variance, reflected states of anxiety and depression. However, this did not differ between the groups. The second factor expressed issues of energy and perceived health. The third factor expressed the degree to which subjects felt in control of their emotions, thoughts and behaviors.;Completers are characterized by a lower sense of self control, but are energetic and not worried about their health. Dropouts feel firmly in control of their emotions thoughts and behaviors, but have lower levels of energy and express concerns about their health.
    Permanent Link(s)
    https://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9919378
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/3817
    Citation
    Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-02, Section: B, page: 8150.
    *This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise.
    Collections
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations [1231]

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University
     

     

    Browse

    AllCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login as Editor

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University