• Login as Editor
    View Item 
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Relations among emotion knowledge, social competence and aggression

    Thumbnail

    Date
    1999
    Author
    Schmitt, Tina Marie
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    Abstract
    This project examined the connections among 51 preschoolers ( M = 53.25 months) emotion knowledge, normative conceptions of sociomoral affect, social competence, and aggression. Naturalistic observational assessments were made of children's peer aggression. In addition, measures were obtained of children's emotion knowledge, normative conceptions of sociomoral affect, social skills and peer acceptance. Collectively, peer acceptance, as rated by peers, and social skills, as rated by teachers, were referred to as social competence. Additionally, the relations among the three components of emotion knowledge (emotion recognition, emotion labeling and situational affect) were assessed.;As expected, preschoolers' abilities to recognize and label emotions and their understanding of situational affect were significantly interrelated although the association between situational affect and emotion labeling was significantly greater than the correlations involving either emotion recognition and emotion labeling or emotion recognition and situational affect. Furthermore, children's normative conceptions of sociomoral affect involving victimizers but not victims were associated with these emotion-related abilities.;Results indicated, as expected, that children with a greater understanding of emotions were both less aggressive and more accepted by peers, and that these connections held both for the overall emotion knowledge task and for each of the separate emotion abilities within that task (i.e. emotion labeling, emotion recognition, and situational affect). By contrast, children with more normative conceptions of sociomoral affect were less likely to be the target of aggression, but conceptions of sociomoral affect were not linked with children's peer acceptance or initiation of aggression. Finally, children who initiated relatively more aggressive acts were less accepted by their peers and were judged to be less socially competent by their teachers.
    Permanent Link(s)
    https://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9974052
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/3895
    Citation
    Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-05, Section: B, page: 2799.;Advisors: Bill Arsenio.
    *This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise.
    Collections
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations [1231]

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University
     

     

    Browse

    AllCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login as Editor

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University