Non-Penal Justifications for Felony Disenfranchisement as Reflected in States' Constitutions
The file is restricted.
Please click here to access if the item description shows YU only.
MetadataShow full item record
The file is restricted for YU community access only.
The right to vote has been viewed as a fundamental right since the establishment of the United States. To protect the democracy and representation that the founding fathers had fought for, it was of utmost importance that the right to vote would be extended to all citizens1 . Whereas at the establishment of the nation the right was reserved for White males, as time progressed, more and more people have been given the opportunity to participate in democracy. This includes women, Blacks, and young adults2 . Presently, there are still members of society who are not granted the right to vote. This group includes aliens, minors, those deemed mentally incapable, and people who have been convicted of felonies. It is not difficult to conceive of a justification for denying the right from the first three groups of people, as they are either not officially a member of the society or are not mentally capable of voting responsibly, but difficulties arise upon trying to justify excluding those members of society who have been convicted of felonies3 . Currently, only two states, Vermont and Maine, allow felons to vote even while incarcerated4 . The rest of the 48 states differ with regard to for how long they exclude criminals, with some denying the right for life and others only for the period of time in which the person is actually incarcerated5 . However, the precedent has been set that it is indeed justifiable and constitutional for the states to take away this right.
The file is restricted. Please click here to access if the item description shows YU only.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Drugged Wildlife: The Potential Impacts of Environmental Endocrine Disruptors on Reproductive Development Kramer-Rex, Melissa (Stern College for Women, 2015-12)The growing use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapeutics gives rise to the concern that estrogenic and progestogenic compounds are present in wastewater at concentrations that may affect aquatic species. This study ...
Affordable Care Act Enrollment: Analysis of Variation in Nationwide Implementation and Implications for Health Equity Zimilover, Madeline Tavin (Stern College for Women, 2015-04)Signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) promised to radically alter the healthcare landscape of America. Through ...
Harm Reduction Applied: Syringe Exchange Programs (SEP) Examining the history, ideology, controversy, efficacy and application of SEPs Dreyfus, Nechama (Stern College for Women, 2015-04)Drug use is not a simple topic. Within this one topic there are layers of historical perceptions and misperceptions, political opinions, social stigmas, public health aspects and potential clinical relevance all combined ...