• Login as Editor
    View Item 
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Yeshiva Academic Institutional Repository
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Dispositional hope and diabetes self-management: Exploring the roles of agency and pathways

    Thumbnail

    Date
    2017
    Author
    Frackman, Gabrielle
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    Abstract
    This dissertation examined relationships between dispositional hope (hope), and key diabetes treatment-related processes and outcomes (diabetes self-management, self-reported and objective medication adherence and glycemic control). It was hypothesized that higher levels of hope would be significantly associated with more favorable diabetes self-management and control. The final sample was comprised of 104 participants with type 2 diabetes recruited from Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center. Participants included individuals from the original sample of 120 who completed follow-up measures of: hope and its component parts (agency and pathways), diabetes-related emotional distress, diabetes self-management and medication adherence. Participants provided blood samples or access to recent medical records of HbAlc. Adherence was monitored by MEMS caps over three months of follow-up. Moderation effects of hope on the relationship between emotional burden of diabetes and outcome variables were assessed, as were interaction effects between agency and pathways on diabetes self-management and control. Hope was associated with greater self-reported (r = .24,p < .01) and objective medication adherence (r= -21,p < .01). Entered separately into regression models, hope components were significantly associated with better adherence; however, entered into the model together, effects were generally not independent, with the exception of pathways remaining significantly associated with better objective adherence (MEMS). Hope was significantly related to better self-reported medication adherence, while only pathways was significantly related to better objective adherence (MEMS). Hope was not related to diabetes self-management or glycemic control. Results suggest hope might be used to better predict diabetes treatment adherence. Results did not generally support Snyder's two-factor model nor suggest that hope buffers against effects of diabetes distress on diabetes self-management and treatment adherence.
    Permanent Link(s)
    https://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10741906
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/472
    Citation
    Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: B.;Advisors: Jeffrey Gonzalez.
    *This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise.
    Collections
    • Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations [1231]

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University
     

     

    Browse

    AllCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login as Editor

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Yeshiva University Libraries copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    YAIR Self-Deposit | YAIR User's Guide | Take Down Policy | Contact Us
    Yeshiva University