An Analysis of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik’s Utilization of Dialectic.
Date
2020-05-06Author
Yeshiva University, degree granting institution.
Guindi, Linda
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Consequently, the Rav’s extension of Man’s perpetual dialectic condition to the
meta-dialectic can be understood as representing the Rav’s consistency in his emphasis on
perpetuity in regard to Man’s dialectic condition. Its extension exemplifies that while human
scholars and philosophers may attempt to harmonize the human condition through an
understanding of dialectical thinking, there is ultimately no escape from the perpetuity of
dialectical oscillation. Given that the Rav’s perpetual interplay relies on this Man’s perpetual
dialectic, the Rav’s meta-dialectic between Kierkegaard and Hegel can be understood as
legitimizing the philosophical interplay throughout the Rav’s works.
======
Overall, the Rav maintains his ambiguity in his dialectical utilization in an effort to
maintain consistency in its application. As we perpetually oscillate between victory and
retreat, we ultimately do not know in which ethic our cycle ends. Nevertheless, while this
exhaustive analysis may have ended in defeat, there is always halakha to turn to to cheat.
(from Conclusion)
Description
Senior honors thesis. Open Access.
Permanent Link(s)
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/5634Collections
Item Preview
The following license files are associated with this item: