Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCohen, Mordechai Z.
dc.identifier.citationCohen, Mordechai Z. “Logic to Interpretation: Maimonides’ Use of Al-Farabi’s Model of Metaphor,” Zutot: Perspectives on Jewish Culture 2.1 (2002): 104–113.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1875-0214 ; 1571-7283
dc.descriptionScholarly articleen_US
dc.description.abstractMaimonides' interests in language and interpretation converge in the exegetical sections of his Guide of the Perplexed, in which he often invokes the notion of metaphor (Ar. isti"ara; Hebr. hash'alah), a concept defined in various ways by different intellectual streams current in his day. Two parallel models of metaphor emerged in the so-called logical tradition of Arabic learning and Quranic hermeneutics, while a completely different one was formulated by Arab experts on poetry.' Jewish exegetes in Muslim lands naturally applied the hermeneutic model of metaphor to Hebrew Scripture.2 Adopting a more unique stance, Moses ibn Ezra sought traces of the poetic model in biblical verse.3 Not surprisingly, Maimonides drew his conception of metaphor from al-Farabi's logic, as earlier scholars have noted.4 Yet, as we shall demonstrate, he tailored the Farabian model of metaphor to suit his philosophical exegetical program. (from Introduction)en_US
dc.publisherDordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, c2002- ; Brillen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZutot: Perspectives on Jewish Culture;2(1)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.subjectmodel of metaphoren_US
dc.subjectbiblical hermeneuticsen_US
dc.titleLogic to Interpretation: Maimonides' Use of al-Fârâbî's Model of Metaphor.en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States