Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPollack, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorReiter, Elisa
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T16:00:51Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T16:00:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-03
dc.identifier.citationPollack, daniel and Reiter, Elisa. No peeking allowed. (November 3, 2020). Texas Lawyer. https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2020/11/03/no-peeking-allowed/en_US
dc.identifier.issn0267-8306
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/6324
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2020/11/03/no-peeking-allowed/
dc.descriptionCommentary / Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractJudges have a responsibility to recuse themselves from any cases in which they cannot act impartially. Today, ironically, in the very name of justice, there are people who want Justitia’s blindfold not to be tightened, but to be loosened.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAustin, Tex. : Butterworth Legal Publishersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTexas Lawyer;November 3, 2020
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectrecusalen_US
dc.subjectremote participationen_US
dc.subjectZoomen_US
dc.subjectcourt hearingsen_US
dc.subjectimpartial justiceen_US
dc.subjectCovid-19en_US
dc.subjectjurorsen_US
dc.subjectjudgesen_US
dc.subjectNational Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice (NCCCJ)en_US
dc.subjectvirtual courtsen_US
dc.subjectwitnessesen_US
dc.subjectJurisprudential peekingen_US
dc.subjecttechnological innovationen_US
dc.subjectjudicial excellenceen_US
dc.titleNo peeking allowed.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States