Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReiter, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorPollack, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T15:43:47Z
dc.date.available2022-03-17T15:43:47Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-15
dc.identifier.citationhttps://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2022/03/15/there-is-a-marital-property-legislative-gap-that-needs-some-sealant/en_US
dc.identifier.issn0267-8306 (print)
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/359247651_There_is_a_marital_property_legislative_gap_that_needs_some_sealanten_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/7974
dc.descriptionExpert Opinionen_US
dc.description.abstractPipes can spring leaks even if they overlap. If a coupler joint fails, a bit of sealant can fix the leak. So too with legislative gaps, especially when they impact jurisdiction and standing, and sublime distinctions between the Texas Family Code and the Texas Estates Code. These issues were presented in Moody v. Moody. The case also involves a disagreement between certain members of the decedent’s first and second families, notwithstanding the fact that William Lewis Moody, IV had been married to his secondwife for 50 years.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherALMen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTexas Lawyer;March 15, 2022
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectTexas Family Codeen_US
dc.subjectTexas Estates Codeen_US
dc.subjectlegislative gapsen_US
dc.titleThere is a marital property legislative gap that needs some sealanten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7323-6928en_US
local.yu.facultypagehttps://www.yu.edu/faculty/pages/pollack-danielen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States