What ‘Safety First’ for Children Should Mean
Description
Analysis
Abstract
By keeping safety as paramount and separate, courts will not weigh parental rights against child safety. Safety will be the sole consideration. A child should be entitled to no less safeguards than an adult at a domestic violence hearing. Indeed, it is up to the court to assure children this in its role as parens patriae. Violence to a child is an assault, battery, or some other criminal act. Such allegations should be referred to and investigated by a prosecutor. Indeed, there should be no action permitted by a family court where these allegations exist other than to enter a no contact order between the named perpetrator and the child until a criminal process is completed. Child safety must be addressed properly by the courts as required by the Constitution.(from Conclusion)
Permanent Link(s)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361468716_What_'Safety_First'_for_Children_Should_Meanhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8277
Citation
Kleinman, T. & Pollack, D. (2022, June 22). What ‘Safety First’ for Children Should Mean. New York Law Journal, https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2022/06/22/what-safety-first-for-children-should-mean/?slreturn=20220522150806 .
*This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise.
Collections
Item Preview
The following license files are associated with this item: