dc.contributor.author | Kanarfogel, Ephraim | |
dc.contributor.editor | Engel, David | |
dc.contributor.editor | Schiffman, Lawrence | |
dc.contributor.editor | Wolfson, Elliot | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-09T17:17:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-09T17:17:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kanarfogel, E. (2012). Dreams as a determinant of Jewish law and practice in northern Europe during the high middle ages; In David Engel, Lawrence Schiffmann, Elliot Wolfson (eds.), "Studies in medieval Jewish intellectual and social history : festschrift in honor of Robert Chazan" (pp. 111-143). Leiden: Brill. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789004222366 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/yeshiva-ebooks/reader.action?docID=848694&ppg=123 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8516 | |
dc.description | Scholarly book chapter | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Jewish society in northern Europe (Ashkenaz) during the high Middle
Ages has been characterized as decidedly halakhocentric—religious
norms and rituals were meant to conform to authoritative texts of Jewish
law. In situations where long-standing rituals or practices appeared
to con!ict with talmudic rulings or other halakhic prescriptions, the
most important rabbinical "gures in northern France and Germany,
the Tosa"sts, attempted to reconcile these practices with canonized
texts, by means of newly developed forms of dialectical interpretation.1
Jacob Katz has charted the noteworthy degree to which laymen were
devoted to the instructions of the rabbinical elite, as well as the “ritual
instinct” that was generally prevalent throughout medieval Ashkenazic
society, both of which allowed these reconciliations to be pursued
e#ectively and without hesitation.2 ¶
Given their allegiance to textuality as the ultimate arbiter of Ashkenazic
practice and ritual, it is rather surprising to discover that a number
of leading Tosa"sts and other rabbinical scholars in the twel$h
and thirteenth centuries made use of dream experiences as a means of
determining Jewish law or ratifying earlier legal opinions. As we shall
see, such an approach was clearly at odds with contemporary Spanish
or Sefardic (halakhic) rationalism as represented by Maimonides
(1138–1204); with the position of leading halakhists who were also
strongly grounded in Kabbalah such as Nahmanides (1194–1270); and
even with view of Rashi (1040–1105), the non-philosophically inclined
doyen of Ashkenazic talmudic (and biblical ) interpretation.3 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Leiden: Brill | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | rabbinic literature | en_US |
dc.subject | Medieval Jewish history | en_US |
dc.subject | halakhocentric—religious norms and rituals | en_US |
dc.title | Dreams as a determinant of Jewish law and practice in northern Europe during the high middle ages | en_US |
dc.type | Book chapter | en_US |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7539-7802 | en_US |
local.yu.facultypage | https://www.yu.edu/faculty/pages/kanarfogel-ephraim | en_US |