Articulating the nuances of defendants’ right to self-representation in a criminal trial
Description
Expert opinion
Abstract
What remedy is available for being subjected to violation of the double-jeopardy rule? The appellate court considers the most serious offense, and retains the conviction for the most serious offense, i.e., the offense for which the lengthiest sentence was assessed. The Fort Worth Court of Appeals affirms Wolfe’s convictions that survive the double-jeopardy analysis.
Permanent Link(s)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372959116_Articulating_the_nuances_of_defendants'_right_to_self-representation_in_a_criminal_trialhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9167
Citation
Reiter, E., & Pollack, D. (2023, August 7). Articulating the nuances of defendants' right to self-representation in a criminal trial. Texas Lawyer. https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2023/08/07/articulating-the-nuances-of-defendants-right-to-self-representation-in-criminal-trials/?slreturn=20230708100402
*This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise.
Collections
Item Preview
The following license files are associated with this item: