Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Daniel 3 and 5 as historiography
Authors: Holtz, Shalom
Ganzel, Tova
Keywords: Daniel 3 and 5
Akkadian historiographic sources
Hellenistic Babylonia
shifts in imperial power
motives of historical writing
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Peeters
Citation: Ganzel, T., & Holtz, S. (2022). Daniel 3 and 5 as historiography. Biblica, 3(4), 525-535. doi: 10.2143/BIB.103.4.3291466 .
Series/Report no.: Biblica;103(4)
Abstract: Recent re-assessment of Akkadian historiographic sources prompts re-evaluation of the nature of historiography in Hellenistic Babylonia. Features in Daniel 3 and Daniel 5 find parallels in the historiographic writings from the recently identified circle of Hellenistic Babylonian historians. These shared features, including the narratives’ overall efforts to explain the shifts in imperial power and the ways in which they construct their stories about the past, are consistent with the motives of historical writing during the Hellenistic period.
Description: Scholarly article
ISSN: 0006-0887 (print) 2385-2062 (online)
Appears in Collections:Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies (BRGS): Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ganzel Holtz 2022 Biblica Daniel_3_and_5_as_Historiography.pdf207.05 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons