Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9314
Title: Modeling patent clarity.
Authors: Ashtor, Jonathan H.
Keywords: machine learning techniques
patent claim clarity
late-stage examiner citations
Nautilus v. Biosig
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Ashtor, J. H. (2022). Modeling patent clarity. Research Policy, 51(2), 104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104415
Series/Report no.: Research Policy;51(2)
Abstract: This study uses machine learning techniques to model patent claim clarity and analyze how clarity relates to important patent policy objectives. Specifically, machine learning models are trained on a dataset of over 600,000 U.S. patent applications that were (or were not) rejected for indefiniteness, a proxy for claim clarity, using features based on the linguistic attributes of each application. The model is then applied to over 2 million issued patents and their corresponding applications, deriving estimates of the clarity of each patent’s claim set at application and issuance. ¶ First, the properties of claim clarity and its relationship with the patent examination process are studied. Wordiness and repetitiveness corresponds to reduced clarity, whereas more descriptiveness whereas clearer claims tend to be more descriptive. Clarity also changes during patent examination, indicating that patent office policies may affect claim clarity. ¶ Next, the relationship between claim clarity and cumulative innovation is studied. Clear patents are found to receive more citations by applicants of unrelated future patents, a key indicator of cumulative innovation. However, unclear patents tend to receive more examiner citations, particularly in later years, and the technological relevance of examiner citations also tends to decline over time. This raises important questions about the role of late-stage examiner citations in the patent examination process, which are framed for future research. ¶ Finally, this study evaluates the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Nautilus v. Biosig decision, which sought to improve patent claim clarity. A difference-indifference analysis of applications examined under the old versus new standard is conducted to evaluate the causal effect of Nautilus on the claims of patents filed under the old standard but examined under the new standard. This reveals a significant improvement in patent claim clarity post-Nautilus.
Description: Scholarly article / Open Access
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104415
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9314
ISSN: ISSN 0048-7333 eISSN 1873-7625
Appears in Collections:Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law: Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ashtor 2022 Modeling patent clarity 104415.pdf774.27 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons