The effects of attention resources and dual-task strategies on gait performance in aging: A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms
dc.contributor.author | Li, Clara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-12T17:39:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-12T17:39:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Using non-demented community residing older adults, we aimed to (1) examine dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance in two walking while talking tasks: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC), and (2) assess dual-task strategies by examining interactions between cognitive performance and dual-task costs in gait. Measurements: Gait and cognitive performances were tested in 217 healthy older adults (mean age 75.7 + 8.78, 56.2% female) under single and dual-task conditions. Quantitative gait measures including velocity, swing time, and stride length variability were obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed by calculating accuracy ratio: [number of correct responses] / [number of total responses]. Results: Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs including slower velocity (p < .001), longer swing time (p < .001), greater stride length variability (p < .001), and decreased accuracy ratio (< .001) in WWR and WWC compared to the single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p < .001) and stride length variability (p = .001) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. In the context of the linear mixed effects models significant interactions were observed between cognitive performance (predictor) and dual-task costs in gait (outcome measure) only in WWR (velocity, p = .010; swing time, p = .026; stride length variability, p = .002). Visual depictions of these interactions revealed that decline in cognitive performance were associated with greater dual-task costs in gait performance. Conclusion: Dual-task performance costs in walking while talking paradigms are attributed to limited attentional resources but not to dual-task strategies where older participants show a preference to either the gait or cognitive tasks. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.;Advisors: Roee Holter. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3537543 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/1382 | |
dc.publisher | ProQuest Dissertations & Theses | |
dc.subject | Cognitive psychology. | |
dc.subject | Aging. | |
dc.subject | Gerontology. | |
dc.title | The effects of attention resources and dual-task strategies on gait performance in aging: A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms | |
dc.type | Dissertation |