Compromise and Inclusivity in Establishing Minhag and Halakha: Contextualizing the Approach of R. Meir of Rothenburg
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
YU Faculty Profile
Abstract
In two places within the Talmudic corpus, the Amora R. Nahman bar Yizhaq enunciates the principle that a God-fearing person should seek to fulfill both positions in a halakhic dispute or debate: “One who fears Heaven will acquit himself according to both views” ( יר אמי ש םו י צ אדי שניהם ).¹ A similar strategy is employed in a number of instances by the Amora Rav Pappa, who suggested combining two competing liturgical variants into one inclusive statement or blessing הי לכ ךינמרי נה ו לתוי ר י)ו ה ) in situations ranging from the blessing to be recited after a public reading of the megilla on Purim, to the proper text of the modim prayer recited during the repetition of the amida מודי םדרמב)ן נ ).² Rav Pappa also advocated this methodology for resolving several halakhic issues.³