Voting and optimal provision of a public good.
dc.contributor.author | Shao, Ran | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Lin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-22T18:52:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-22T18:52:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we study the optimal provision of a costly public good using an average efficiency crite- rion. For every fixed cost, we identify a quota mechanism as the optimal mechanism among those that are dominant-incentive-compatible, deficit-free and kind. Moreover, we also consider the asymmetric case and demonstrate that a committee mechanism is optimal for a large class of mechanisms. In particular, this mechanism dominates all VCG (pivotal) mechanisms. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Shao, Ron & Zhou, Lin. February 2016. Voting and optimal provision of a public good. Journal of Public Economics. 134, 35-41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0047-2727 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4018 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | Public good | en_US |
dc.subject | Mechanisms | en_US |
dc.subject | Dominant-incentive compatibility | en_US |
dc.subject | Quotas | en_US |
dc.subject | Committees | en_US |
dc.title | Voting and optimal provision of a public good. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
local.yu.facultypage | https://www.yu.edu/faculty/pages/shao-ran |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Publicgood jan15.pdf
- Size:
- 300.84 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: