Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/3298
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFuentes, Jesus
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T18:31:17Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T18:31:17Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.citationSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 50-11, Section: B, page: 5344.;Advisors: Judith Kaufman.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9013750
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/3298
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of an after-school "writing-as-process" program incorporating time on task with computers among preadolescent and early adolescent public school limited English proficient (LEP) children on enhancing their writing skills in English and Spanish. In addition, it was hypothesized that preadolescents would make greater gains than early adolescents. A total of 109 students between the ages of 8-13 enrolled in the program, representing 61 families. Students were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the computer-assisted experimental group (WP/C); the non-computer assisted experimental group (WP); and the control group (C). Two experimental groups of 36 students each were exposed to intensive instruction in writing-as-process. Experimental Group A (WP/C) underwent intensive writing instruction with computer assistance, while Experimental Group B received instruction without computer support.;Through an analysis of covariance and pairwise analysis of groups, the gain score differences between groups was revealed to be significant and positive for the computer aided group and non-computer aided groups, as compared with the control on both LAB Writing subtest and global scores. The results of this study supported the expectation that LEP students who regularly attend an after-school writing-as-process program will have greater LEP score gains than those students using traditional methods. Additionally, it was found that the use of the computer enhanced global English proficiency significantly, but not writing skills in particular, in combination with "writing-as-process.".;There were no significant differences between gain scores between preadolescents and early adolescents for either English LAB Writing subtest or global scores.
dc.publisherProQuest Dissertations & Theses
dc.subjectDevelopmental psychology.
dc.subjectBilingual education.
dc.titleEffects of a writing program on second language skills of Hispanic students
dc.typeDissertation
Appears in Collections:Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Doctoral Dissertations

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.