Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4053
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLejtman, Daniella Shaindi-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T19:53:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-05T19:53:14Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4053-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=https://repository.yu.edu/handle/20.500.12202/4053
dc.descriptionThe file is restricted for YU community access only.-
dc.description.abstractThe development of different moral systems is a widely discussed topic. Traditionally, psychologists have viewed the development of morality through the lens of cognition and reasoning (e.g. Piaget (1965), Kohlberg (1969), Gilligan (1982)). Others (e.g. Values Clarification Theory) propose that moral values are developed through the integration of rational thought and social context. An innovative approach to morality, the socialintuitionist model, has been suggested by Dr. Jonathan Haidt (2001) and has become the stimulus for the Moral Foundations Theory (Haidt & Joseph, 2006). The Moral Foundations Theory puts forth that morality is inherently intuitive and contains at least five core foundations: Care/Harm, Fairness/Cheating, In-group Loyalty/Betrayal, Authority/Subversion, and Purity/Degradation. This empirical study attempted to determine if religious moral educators in Jewish high schools had any effect on their students’ composition of moral foundations. Additionally, the study attempted to determine if the specific moral foundations would be determined by the self-identified religious stances of the participants. Results showed that the only significant interaction between student cohorts and teacher cohorts was the decline in score of the moral foundation Purity/Degradation from 9th grade to 12th grade, relative to the faculty score. These results imply that religious moral education may play a role in decreasing students’ proclivity towards the moral foundation Purity/Degradation. Results also showed that religious level was significantly associated with the moral foundations of Care/Harm, Authority/Subversion, and Purity/Degradation. Post hoc test results revealed that self-identified more religious participants scored significantly higher in these three foundations. These results imply that religion is crucial in defining the arrangement of a person’s specific moral foundations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipS. Daniel Abraham Honors Programen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherStern College for Womenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectJewish day schools.en_US
dc.subjectJewish religious education of teenagers.en_US
dc.subjectJews --Education (Secondary)en_US
dc.subjectMoral education (Secondary)en_US
dc.subjectOrthodox Judaism.en_US
dc.subjectHigh schools.en_US
dc.titleReligious Moral Education: The Role of Moral Foundations in Jewish High Schoolsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:S. Daniel Abraham Honors Student Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Daniella Lejtman.pdf
  Restricted Access
272.38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons