Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4455
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGidea, Marianen_US
dc.contributor.authorAharon, Grace Golda
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T20:46:25Z
dc.date.available2019-07-03T20:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-25
dc.identifier.citationAharon, Grace Golda. Principal Component Analysis and K-Means Clustering Of Popular Sunscreens. Presented to the S. Daniel Abraham Honors Program In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completion of the Program. Stern College for Women. Yeshiva University. April 25, 2018.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4455
dc.identifier.urihttps://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=https://repository.yu.edu/handle/20.500.12202/4455
dc.descriptionThe file is restricted for YU community access only.en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Sunscreen application gains more emphasis every year as a means to defend against sunburns and skin cancer. There are thousands of sunscreens available for consumers to purchase, ranging in price, efficacy, and ingredients. While the use of sunscreen is supported by such organizations as the Unites States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), scientific research suggests that certain ingredients in sunscreen pose potential health hazards to the human body. This study assessed the data on popular sunscreens that is available to the average consumer, to extract the most important information and group similar sunscreens together. 62 popular sunscreens were evaluated based on their UVA protection, UVB protection, the accuracy of the SPF advertized, cost per ounce, Consumer Reports rating, and Environmental Working Group (EWG) health rating. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to reduce the dimensionality of the dataset to 3 principal components, accounting for 89.59% of the variance in the data. Notably, the results of the PCA showed that efficacy scores correlated negatively with health scores. K-means clustering was then administered to group sunscreens into 6 clusters. Ultimately, the study identified one cluster with the best quality sunscreens, possessing very high UVA protection; relatively high UVB protection, SPF accuracy, and Consumer Reports scores; and relatively low health EWG ratings; for a high price.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipS. Daniel Abraham Honors Program for Stern College for Womenen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherStern College for Women. Yeshiva University..en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectsenior honor thesisen_US
dc.subjectsunscreensen_US
dc.subjectK-means clusteringen_US
dc.titlePrincipal Component Analysis and K-Means Clustering Of Popular Sunscreens.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:S. Daniel Abraham Honors Student Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Senior Project.pdf
  Restricted Access
submitted by HR/SCW2.2 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons