Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4588
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPollack, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorSchnall, David J.-
dc.contributor.editorCarmy, Shalom-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-06T23:20:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-06T23:20:11Z-
dc.identifier.citationPollack, Daniel and Schnall, David J. (2003). Veshinantam Levanekha: Exploring the Right to Education in the American and Jewish Legal Tradition. Tradition. 37(4) Jewish Education: A Special Issue.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0041-0608-
dc.identifier.urihttp://traditionarchive.org/news/_pdfs/Pollack-Schnall.1.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4588-
dc.descriptionScholarly article. Later reprinted in The Azrieli Papers: Dimension of Orthodox Day School Education. Ed. by David J. Schnall and Moshe Sokolow. NY: Michael Scharf Publication Trust of Yeshiva University Press, 2011: 1-21.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe right to a basic education in the United States is more or less taken for granted. It is assumed that children will attend school from a very young age until their late teens, if not for longer. Given Judaism's broad emphasis upon study both as an instrumental tool and a religious, often obligatory value in itself, one might also expect its legal tradition to project such a right in unmistakable terms. Yet in both instances, the discovery and the identification of a right to education is no simple matter. And the issue is quite important, especially as it bears upon children who for one reason or another do not fit well in mainstream educational settings.---/ This study will examine the scope of any right to education in both the American and Jewish legal traditions; first, by surveying recent American legal opinion concerning how individual states determine -- and ought to determine -- their own educational policies; this will be followed by a parallel survey of biblical and rabbinic attitudes about where study is conducted and about the proper roles of public authorities and private individuals in overseeing education. The ensuing section applied the earlier considerations to cases of children who struggle in the conventional environments. Finally, the conclusion summarizes the outstanding features of teh American and teh classical-Jewish approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRabbinical Council of Americaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTradition;37(4)-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectRight to educationen_US
dc.subjectJewish legal traditionen_US
dc.subjectSan Antonion Independent School District v. Rodriguezen_US
dc.subjectPlyler v. Doeen_US
dc.subjectRose v. council for Better Education, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectWilkinsburg v. Wilkinsburg Education Associationen_US
dc.subjectprivate schoolsen_US
dc.subjectHutchenson v. Grace Lutheran Schoolen_US
dc.subjectFlint v. St. Augustine High Schoolen_US
dc.subjectZero Tolerance Lawsen_US
dc.subjectTalmud Torahen_US
dc.subjectMandate to educate womenen_US
dc.subjectBen-Gamla --Retention of teachersen_US
dc.subjectthe problem childen_US
dc.subjectRabbi Abraham Karelitzen_US
dc.titleVeshinantam Levanekha: Exploring the Right to Education in the American and Jewish Legal Tradition.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:The Azrieli Papers.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pollack-Schnall.1.pdfFrom Tradition website124.16 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons