Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4777
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFreedman, Jeffrey-
dc.contributor.authorGordin, Ari-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-28T20:32:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-28T20:32:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationGordin, Ari. (Fall 2017-Spring 2019). Scientific Thought: Validation Through Publication via The Transactional Accounts of the Royal Society in the 17th Century Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Jay and Jeanie Schottenstein Honors Program. Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/4777-
dc.descriptionSenior honors thesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThe age of the Internet has transformed scholarly publishing from a closed and highly scrutinized process to a relatively unsupervised and open online affair. Predatory scientific journals have emerged online and solicit contributions from young researchers anxious to publish their work; the plethora of scientific journals has led to confusions over validity within the scientific community. The skepticism necessary for scientific progress has receded leading to a rightful shock whenever a researcher is found to have made fraudulent claims. Standards and perhaps even certain ethical principals that date back to the seventieth century have become questionable in the face of the constant and revolutionary progress of research. --- The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London could be considered the earliest scientific periodical. The fellows of the Royal Society of London emerged as the leading scientific society in the English-speaking world due to their adherence to a set of standards proposed by Francis Bacon and implemented by Henry Oldenburg and Robert Boyle among other prominent academy fellows. These standards created a framework for evaluating claims to knowledge about the natural world, aiding both the respected and amateur scientist in their attempts to describe discoveries to the reading public. The Transactional Accounts of the Royal Society published periodically and edited by Henry Oldenburg legitimized scientific discoveries in an era in which the criteria for evaluating them had not yet been formalized. The publication and organization of the society served as a model for future royal academies of science. In order to grasp the significance of the Philosophical Transactions, we need to situate that publication within the broader context of the paradigm shift in thought and understanding of the natural world termed ‘The Scientific Revolution,’ which occurred in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJay and Jeanie Schottenstein Honors Programen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNY: Yeshiva College. Yeshiva University.en_US
dc.subjectSenior honors thesisen_US
dc.subjectScientific thoughten_US
dc.subjectValidation through publicationen_US
dc.subjectRoyal Society of London -- 17th Centuryen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophical transactionsen_US
dc.titleScientific Thought: Validation Through Publication via The Transactional Accounts of the Royal Society in the 17th Centuryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Jay and Jeanie Schottenstein Honors Student Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ari Gordin Senior Honors Thesis.pdf447.11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.