Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/6825
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPollack, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSarteschi, Christine M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T20:33:50Z
dc.date.available2021-05-27T20:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-27
dc.identifier.citationPollack, D. & Sarteschi, C.M. (2021, May 27). The competency conundrum. The New York Law Journal, https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/05/27/a-competency-conundrum/?cmp_shareen_US
dc.identifier.issn0028-7326
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/05/27/a-competency-conundrum/?cmp_shareen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/6825
dc.descriptionLegal commentaryen_US
dc.description.abstractAttorneys who interact with mentally ill clients, especially those with serious mental illnesses, are likely to encounter someone with anosognosia. It is important to understand that individuals with this symptom do not recognize that they are ill.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherALM Media Propertiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe New York Law Journal;May 27, 2021
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectmental illnessen_US
dc.subjectcompetencyen_US
dc.subjectimpaired judgmenten_US
dc.subjectanosognosiaen_US
dc.subjectforensic psychiatric evaluation of competenceen_US
dc.subjectDusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960)en_US
dc.titleA competency conundrum.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7323-6928
local.yu.facultypagehttps://www.yu.edu/faculty/pages/pollack-daniel
Appears in Collections:Wurzweiler School of Social Work: Faculty publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pollack Sarteschi 27May2021 art NYLJ A Competency Conundrum.pdf204.66 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons