Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8005
Title: Collaborative divorce has many advantages, but some disadvantages too
Authors: Reiter, Elisa
Pollack, Daniel
000-0001-7323-6928
Keywords: collaborative divorce
legal representation
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2022
Publisher: ALM
Citation: Reiter, E. & Pollack, D. (2022, April 1). Collaborative divorce has many advantages, but some disadvantages too, Daily Business Review, https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2022/04/01/collaborative-divorce-has-many-advantages-but-some-disadvantages-too/ .
Series/Report no.: Daily Business Review;April 1, 2022
Abstract: For couples contemplating divorce, collaborative divorce can be an attractive approach to respectfully resolve their differences without going to trial. Often, it is also less adversarial, more economical, and holds the potential of a more expedient resolution. And, many family law attorneys encourage couples to take a collaborative law route for the sake of the children. Their belief is that keeping the divorce process less contentious will help the parent-child relationships later on. Parties who choose a collaborative process will generally agree not to litigate, nor even raise the possibility of adversarial actions at the courthouse. By doing so, a collaborative stance is regarded as sacrosanct. Indeed, if the collaborative process is not successful, the attorneys will not and cannot represent their respective clients in subsequent court proceedings.
Description: Commentary
URI: https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2022/04/01/collaborative-divorce-has-many-advantages-but-some-disadvantages-too/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359659693_Collaborative_divorce_has_many_advantages_but_some_disadvantages_too
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8005
Appears in Collections:Wurzweiler School of Social Work: Faculty publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Reiter Pollack 1Apr2022 art DBR Collaborative divorce.pdf265.46 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons