Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8197
Title: Attorneys May Suffer Consequences for Using Their Clients' Ill-Gotten Evidence
Authors: Pollack, Daniel
Reiter, Elisa
0000-0001-7323-6928
Keywords: attorney immunity
child custody disputes
disclosure
family law
Issue Date: 18-May-2022
Publisher: ALM
Citation: Reiter, E. & Pollack, D. (2022, May 18). Attorneys May Suffer Consequences for Using Their Clients' Ill-Gotten Evidence. Texas Lawyer, https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2022/05/18/attorneys-may-suffer-consequences-for-using-their-clients-ill-gotten-evidence/ .
Series/Report no.: Texas Lawyer;May 18, 2022
Abstract: Do we ask our clients where and how they obtained evidence when they mysteriously present emails between their spouse (whose interests are adversarial to their own) in the future? Likely, we must—to avoid just the type of conundrum that Taylor finds herself in. Further, “the attorney-immunity doctrine does not apply to all conduct by attorneys, so attorneys are not precluded from being the subject of a wiretap claim even though some of their conduct may give rise to an immunity defense.” Attorney immunity, after all, is “not boundless.”
Description: Expert Opinion
URI: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360691506_Attorneys_may_suffer_consequences_for_using_their_clients'_ill-gotten_evidence
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8197
ISSN: 0267-8306 (print)
Appears in Collections:Wurzweiler School of Social Work: Faculty publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pollack Sands 19May2022 art NYLJ Can giving chores to a foster child be forced labor.pdf231.94 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons