Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9322
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAafjes-Van Doorn, Katie-
dc.contributor.authorKamsteeg, Céline-
dc.contributor.authorBate, Jordan-
dc.contributor.authorAafjes, Marc-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T19:40:03Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-17T19:40:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAafjes-Van Doorn, K., Kamsteeg, C., Bate, J., & Aafjes, M. (2021). A scoping review of machine learning in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 31(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1808729en_US
dc.identifier.issn1050-3307 (print) 1468-4381 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1808729en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9322-
dc.descriptionScholarly articleen_US
dc.description.abstractMachine learning (ML) offers robust statistical and probabilistic techniques that can help to make sense of large amounts of data. This scoping review paper aims to broadly explore the nature of research activity using ML in the context of psychological talk therapies, highlighting the scope of current methods and considerations for clinical practice and directions for future research. Using a systematic search methodology, fifty-one studies were identified. A narrative synthesis indicates two types of studies, those who developed and tested an ML model (k=44), and those who reported on the feasibility of a particular treatment tool that uses an ML algorithm (k=7). Most model development studies used supervised learning techniques to classify or predict labeled treatment process or outcome data, whereas others used unsupervised techniques to identify clusters in the unlabeled patient or treatment data. Overall, the current applications of ML in psychotherapy research demonstrated a range of possible benefits for indications of treatment process, adherence, therapist skills and treatment response prediction, as well as ways to accelerate research through automated behavioral or linguistic process coding. Given the novelty and potential of this research field, these proof-of-concept studies are encouraging, however, do not necessarily translate to improved clinical practice (yet).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPsychotherapy Research;31(1)-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectpsychotherapyen_US
dc.subjectscoping reviewen_US
dc.subjectbig dataen_US
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_US
dc.titleA scoping review of machine learning in psychotherapy researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2020.1808729en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2584-5897
local.yu.facultypagehttps://www.yu.edu/faculty/pages/aafjes-van-doorn-katieen_US
Appears in Collections:Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons