Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9374
Title: Computerised cognitive remediation to enhance mobility in older adults: A single-blind, single-centre, randomised trial.
Authors: Holtzer, Roee
Verghese, Joe
Mahoney, Jeannette R
Ayers, Emmeline
Ambrose, Anne
Wang, Cuiling
0000-0001-6639-0724
Keywords: computerized programme
brain game
mobility decline
older adults
Short Physical Performance Battery
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Verghese, J., Mahoney, J. R., Ayers, E., Ambrose, A., Wang, C., & Holtzer, R. (2021). Computerised cognitive remediation to enhance mobility in older adults: A single-blind, single-centre, randomised trial. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(9), e571–e579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00173-2
Series/Report no.: The Lancet Healthy Longevity;2(9)
Abstract: _Summary_ _Background_ Decline in executive functions and related cognitive processes is associated with mobility decline, and these functions might be amenable to cognitive remediation. This study aimed to examine whether a computerised cognitive remediation programme would improve walking in adults aged 70 years and older. _Methods_ This single-blind, randomised trial at one academic centre in the USA evaluated the efficacy of an 8-week computerised programme (also known as brain games) of progressive intensity and complexity to improve walking in older adults at high-risk for mobility disability. Inclusion criteria included being 70 years or older; ambulatory; and at high-risk for mobility disability, defined using a cutscore of nine or less (frail range) on the Short Physical Performance Battery and a walking speed of 100 cm/s or less. Individuals with dementia, acute or terminal medical illnesses, recent or planned surgery a ecting mobility, mobility limitations solely due to musculoskeletal limitation or pain that prevented them from completing mobility tests, and those who were nursing home residents were excluded. Participants were block randomised (1:1; block size 12 and no stratification) to the intervention group or the control group (low complexity computer games and health education classes). Primary outcomes were change in walking speed at normal pace and walking while talking conditions assessed from baseline to 8 weeks post-interventionby investigators who were masked to group assignment. Groups were compared using the intention-to-treat principle with linear mixed models adjusted for confounders. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrails.gov, NCT02567227. Findings Between March 1, 2016, and March 12,2020, 383 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. After randomisation, 11 (3%) patients were diagnosed with dementia. 372 (97%; 271 [73%] women) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Themean age of participants was 77·0 years [SD 5·6]). 183 (49·2%) participants were Black and 62(16·7%) were Hispanic. 314 (93%) of the target 338 completers had finished the intervention when the trial was terminated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there were significant within-group improvements in both groups after the 8-week intervention, there was no significant difference in normal walking speed (–1·03 cm/s [SD 1·30]; 95% CI –3·60 to 1·54) and walking while talking conditions (0·59 cm/s [SD 1·61]; 95% CI –2·59 to 3·76) between the intervention and control groups. Similarly, within-group, but no between-group, differences were seen on executive function tests and physical function. There were no severe adverse events related to interventions. _Interpretation_ Computerised cognitive remediation improved walking in adults aged 70 years and older at high-risk for mobility disability, but improvements were not significantly greater compared with an active control. Although our findings corroborate the within-group improvements on cognition and mobility reported in previous pilot clinical trials, future studies are required to determine the optimal dose, frequency, intensity, and content of computerised cognitive remediation programmes.
Description: Scholarly article / Open access
URI: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhl/article/PIIS2666-7568(21)00173-2/fulltext
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9374
ISSN: ISSN: 2666-7568.
Appears in Collections:Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Holtzer 2021 OA Computerized cognitive PIIS2666756821001732.pdf367.24 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons