Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9412
Title: Response to mindfulness-based cognitive therapy differs between chronic and episodic migraine.
Authors: Seng, Elizabeth K.
Conway, Alexandra B.
Grinberg, Amy S.
Patel, Zarine S.
Marzouk, Maya
Rosenberg, Lauren
Metts, Christopher
Day, Melissa A.
Minen, Mia T.
Buse, Dawn C.
Lipton, Richard B.
0000-0002-8938-4949
Keywords: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine (MBCT-M)
chronic migraine (CM)
Severe Migraine Disability Assessment Scale
Cognitive therapy -- Analysis
Analysis
Population health -- Analysis
Medical schools -- Analysis
Migraine -- Analysis
Medical colleges -- Analysis
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, WK Health
Citation: Seng, E. K., Conway, A. B., Grinberg, A. S., Patel, Z. S., Marzouk, M., Rosenberg, L., Metts, C., Day, M. A., Minen, M. T., Buse, D. C., & Lipton, R. B. (2021).Response to mindfulness-based cognitive therapy differs between chronic and episodic migraine. Neurology: Clinical Practice, 11(3), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000984
Series/Report no.: Neurology: Clinical Practice;11(3)
Abstract: __Objective__ Evaluate whether the benefits of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine (MBCT-M) on headache disability differs among people with episodic and chronic migraine (CM). __Methods__ This is a planned secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. After a 30-day baseline, participants were stratified by episodic (6–14 d/mo) and CM (15–30 d/mo) and randomized to 8 weekly individual sessions of MBCT-M or wait list/treatment as usual (WL/TAU). Primary outcomes (Headache Disability Inventory; Severe Migraine Disability Assessment Scale [scores ≥ 21]) were assessed at months 0, 1, 2, and 4. Mixed models for repeated measures tested moderation with fixed effects of treatment, time, CM, and all interactions. Planned subgroup analyses evaluated treatment*time in episodic and CM. __Results__ Of 60 participants (MBCT-M N = 31, WL/TAU N = 29), 52% had CM. CM moderated the effect of MBCT-M on Severe Migraine Disability Assessment Scale, F(3, 205) = 3.68, p = 0.013; MBCT-M vs WL/TAU reduced the proportion of people reporting severe disability to a greater extent among people with episodic migraine (−40.0% vs −14.3%) than CM (−16.4% vs +8.7%). Subgroup analysis revealed MBCT-M (vs WL/TAU) significantly reduced Headache Disability Inventory for episodic (p = 0.011) but not CM (p = 0.268). __Conclusions__ MBCT-M is a promising treatment for reducing headache-related disability, with greater benefits in episodic than CM. __Trial Registration Information__ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02443519. __Classification of Evidence__ This study provides Class III evidence that MBCT-M reduces headache disability to a greater extent in people with episodic than CM.
Description: Scholarly article
URI: https://ezproxy.yu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,sso&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.671867080&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9412
Appears in Collections:Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons