Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9668
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Andrea L.-
dc.contributor.authorPurdon, Christine-
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, Leanne-
dc.contributor.authorCarriere, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.authorSmilek, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T19:47:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-18T19:47:54Z-
dc.date.issued2015-04-
dc.identifier.citationNelson, A. L., Purdon, C., Quigley, L., Carriere, J., & Smilek, D. (2015). Distinguishing the roles of trait and state anxiety on the nature of anxiety-related attentional biases to threat using a free viewing eye movement paradigm. Cognition & Emotion, 29(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.922460en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-9931-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9668-
dc.descriptionScholarly articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough attentional biases to threatening information are thought to contribute to the development and persistence of anxiety disorders, it is not clear whether an attentional bias to threat (ABT) is driven by trait anxiety, state anxiety or an interaction between the two. ABT may also be influenced by “top down” processes of motivation to attend or avoid threat. In the current study, participants high, mid and low in trait anxiety viewed high threat-neutral, mild threat-neutral and positive-neutral image pairs for 5 seconds in both calm and anxious mood states while their eye movements were recorded. State anxiety alone, but not trait anxiety, predicted greater maintenance of attention to high threat images (relative to neutral) following the first fixation (i.e., delayed disengagement) and over the time course. Motivation was associated with the time course of attention as would be expected, such that those motivated to look towards negative images showed the greatest ABT over time, and those highly motivated to look away from negative images showed the greatest avoidance. Interestingly, those ambivalent about where to direct their attention when viewing negative images showed the greatest ABT in the first 500 ms of viewing. Implications for theory and treatment of anxiety disorders, as well as areas for further study, are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Cognition & Emotion is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCognition & Emotion;-
dc.relation.ispartofseries;29(3)-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectTrait anxietyen_US
dc.subjectState anxietyen_US
dc.subjectAttentional biasen_US
dc.subjectThreaten_US
dc.subjectEye movementsen_US
dc.titleDistinguishing the roles of trait and state anxiety on the nature of anxiety-related attentional biases to threat using a free viewing eye movement paradigmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.922460en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3676-4083en_US
local.yu.facultypagehttps://www.yu.edu/faculty/pages/quigley-leanneen_US
Appears in Collections:Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology: Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons