Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9945
Title: Charge calibration standard for atomic force microscope tips in liquids
Authors: Zypman, Fredy
Li, Li
Steinmetz, Nicole F.
Eppell, Steven J.
0000-0002-2033-3772
Keywords: electric charge standard
nanoscale
atomic force microscope (AFM)
electron microscopy
Issue Date: 17-Nov-2020
Citation: Li, L., Steinmetz, N.F., Eppell, S.J., & Zypman, F.R. (2020, November 17) Charge calibration standard for atomic force microscope tips in liquids. Langmuir, 36(45), 13621-13632.
Series/Report no.: Langmuir;36(45)
Abstract: An electric charge standard with nanoscale resolution is created using the known charge distribution of a single tobacco mosaic virus coat protein combined with the known packing of these proteins in the virus capsid. This advances the ability to measure charge on nanometric samples. Experimental atomic force microscope (AFM) force-distance curves are collected under aqueous conditions with controlled pH and ion concentration. A mathematical model that considers a polarizable dielectric tip immersed in an electrolyte is used to obtain charge density from the AFM measurements. Interactions between the tip and the sample are modeled using theory that includes monopolar electrostatic interactions, dipolar interactions, screening from both the dielectric nature of ambient water and solvated ions as described by the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation, and hard-core repulsion. It is found that the tip charge density changes on a timescale of hours requiring recalibration of the tip for experiments lasting more than an hour. As an example of how a charge-calibrated tip may be used, the surface charge densities on 20 individual carboxylate-modified polystyrene (PS) beads are measured. The average of these AFM-measured bead charge densities is compared with the value obtained from conventional titration combined with electron microscopy. The two values are found to agree within 20%. While the comparison demonstrates similarity of the two charge measurements, hypotheses are put forward as to why the two techniques might be expected not to provide identical mean charge densities. The considerations used to build these hypotheses thus underscore the relevance of the method performed here if charge information is required on individual nanoparticles.
Description: Research article
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/9945
ISSN: 07437463
Appears in Collections:Yeshiva College: Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons