Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8442
Title: Were the Federal Courts Biased Against Trump? An Analysis of the Trump Administration’s Failure through the Courts
Authors: Zaitseva, Maria
Chill, Jonah
Keywords: President Donal Trump
United States Supreme Court
binomial regression
judiciary
Republican judicial appointments
violation of administrative procedures
Issue Date: Sep-2022
Publisher: Yeshiva University
Citation: Chill, J. (2022, September). Were the Federal Courts Biased Against Trump? An Analysis of the Trump Administration’s Failure through the Courts [Undergraduate thesis, Yeshiva University].
Series/Report no.: Jay and Jeanine Schottenstein Honors Theses;September 2022
Abstract: This paper will analyze the possible factors of President Donald Trump’s low success rate in the federal courts concerning administrative policies. Whereas Trump’s predecessors were successful about 70 percent of the time due to the deference courts generally grant administrations, Trump’s success rate hovered at approximately 25 percent. The author used a binomial regression to test for bias among the judiciary, finding that even if some bias is present, it is not the only relevant factor. Additional factors are discussed, including the increase in Republican judicial appointments over Trump’s term and the Supreme Court’s influence on lower courts. The third factor discusses the violation of administrative procedures among Trump’s policies, reflective of many of Trump’s own behaviors.
Description: Undergraduate thesis / Open Access
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/8442
Appears in Collections:Jay and Jeanie Schottenstein Honors Student Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Jonah Chill Were the Federal Courts Biased Against Trump Sept2022 OA.pdf198.36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons